The Japanese side is keen on whitewashing what is wrong, trying to create the illusion that nuclear polluted water is safe and harmless by launching an intensive public relations offensive at home and abroad. This practice exposes its selfishness of not caring about the global marine environment and public health but only caring about its own interests.

　　The legitimacy, legality and safety of Japan’s plan to discharge nuclear polluted water into the sea have been questioned by the international community. Protests in Japan and neighboring countries have come and gone, and the voices of opposition from the international community have continued. Japan should have seriously responded to the concerns of the international community and made every effort to dispose of nuclear polluted water in a scientific, safe and transparent way. However, the Japanese side is keen on whitewashing what is wrong, trying to create the illusion that nuclear polluted water is safe and harmless by launching an intensive public relations offensive at home and abroad. This practice exposes its selfishness of not caring about the global marine environment and public health but only caring about its own interests.

　　The Japanese side pushed the plan of discharging nuclear polluted water into the sea, which was accompanied by a well-planned public relations offensive from the beginning. Established in 2012, Reconstruction Agency is responsible for the reconstruction of disaster areas, but the agency allocates public relations funds every year to instill in people the message that the impact of Fukushima nuclear accident has been eliminated. On April 13th, 2021, on the day when the Japanese government unilaterally decided to discharge the nuclear polluted water into the sea, Reconstruction Agency released the propaganda posters and videos made in advance in its official website, in an attempt to "win a good impression" by packaging the indelible radioactive elements in the nuclear polluted water into a mascot image. This move caused serious dissatisfaction among the Japanese people and the international community. The people of Fukushima indignantly pointed out that "(these propaganda) is completely out of place with the grim reality facing Fukushima." In the end, Reconstruction Agency had to withdraw the related products.

　　For more than two years, instead of learning a lesson, Japan has continued to carry out a series of publicity actions to the public around the so-called safety of nuclear polluted water. Many Japanese newspapers, TV stations, etc. publish and broadcast a large number of advertisements about the so-called safety of nuclear polluted water, disturbing and covering up people’s worries and opposition. The Japanese government has repeatedly called the nuclear polluted water that has been treated by the "multi-nuclide treatment system" but still contains many radionuclides "treated water" in an attempt to dilute its pollution characteristics and potential harm. The Japanese government has also set up a special fund with a total amount of 80 billion yen (about 4 billion yuan), and plans to provide "compensation" to the fishing-related industries in areas affected by the discharge of nuclear polluted water into the sea, in an attempt to avoid troubles with the so-called "compensation fee". This is another proof that the Japanese side covers up the harm of nuclear polluted water discharged into the sea.

　　The Japanese side has also stepped up its public relations with some countries, international institutions and organizations, trying to win over all parties to endorse its plan to discharge nuclear polluted water into the sea. In April this year, at the press conference of the meeting of ministers of climate, energy and environment of the Group of Seven, Japanese Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Yasutoshi Nishimura said that the decommissioning of the Fukushima nuclear power plant, including the steady progress in the discharge of nuclear polluted water into the sea, would be welcomed. German Minister of Environment, Nature Protection, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection Lemcke retorted on the spot, saying that "we cannot welcome the discharge of nuclear polluted water into the sea". The Japanese government also used the NATO Summit, the East Asia Cooperation Series Foreign Ministers’ Meeting, the Eastern Caribbean Fisheries Ministers’ Meeting and other occasions to defend the Fukushima nuclear pollution water discharge plan.

　　Whether it is to launch a public opinion offensive at home or to lobby and win over internationally, the Japanese side has used its strength in the wrong place. All parties concerned strongly oppose Japan’s plan to discharge nuclear polluted water into the sea, and demand that Japan stop pushing the plan to discharge nuclear polluted water into the sea, fully communicate with stakeholders including neighboring countries in a sincere manner, effectively dispose of nuclear polluted water in a responsible manner, and accept strict international supervision. However, so far, Japan has been bent on promoting the plan of discharging nuclear polluted water into the sea, not only failing to fully study and demonstrate other disposal schemes, but also failing to seriously respond to the concerns of the international community. Its selfish approach has disappointed the international community.

　　No matter whether it is a public opinion offensive at home or lobbying internationally, Japan’s small moves can’t dispel the doubts of the domestic people and the international community about the discharge of nuclear polluted water into the sea. Recently, Japanese fishermen have repeatedly reiterated their opposition to nuclear pollution water discharging into the sea, and the opposition party in South Korea has also expressed the Korean people’s concerns and opposition to the plan through letters. People in many countries held protests in front of Japanese embassies and consulates in the Philippines, new york, Sydney and other places, demanding that Japan stop the plan of discharging nuclear polluted water into the sea. Because people are well aware that once Japan’s plan to discharge the sea is implemented, it will impose unpredictable nuclear pollution risks on the international community.

　　Discharging nuclear polluted water into the ocean is an adventurous gamble that harms human beings. Japan should face up to the concerns of the international community, shoulder its due moral responsibilities and obligations under international law, and find a proper way to dispose of nuclear polluted water. Until the concerns of the international community about the legitimacy of the nuclear polluted water discharge scheme, data reliability, effectiveness of purification devices and uncertainty of environmental impact are resolved, Japan should not start the nuclear polluted water discharge without authorization.

　Author: Music Entertainment Law

On October 12th, 2020, under the leadership of lebron james, the Los Angeles Lakers won the championship again after ten years, which is undoubtedly the best gift for Lakers fans who lost Black Mamba Kobe Bryant in 2020. Before the Lakers won the championship, it was probably the best news for fans that CCTV replayed the NBA.

In 2019, due to inappropriate remarks made by general manager of NBA Rockets about Hong Kong, which seriously hurt the national feelings of fans in China and China, CCTV decided to stop broadcasting NBA-related events. Even Tencent Sports, which bought the exclusive rights of NBA events in the next five years with a huge sum of money, once stopped broadcasting NBA. Fortunately, CCTV did not completely ban the NBA. Tencent Sports "quietly" rebroadcast the NBA in October 2019. After all, 500 million investment cannot be wasted.

But for fans, Tencent Sports’ high membership fee makes them flinch, so the rebroadcasting of NBA on CCTV Sports Channel is undoubtedly not a "big welfare" for fans. At this time, Xiao Bian, who is an NBA enthusiast and a legal practitioner, is puzzled. Can live sports events be copyrighted as movies? CCTV rebroadcasts the NBA. Is Tencent’s 500 million investment wasted? If you have the same question, let’s find out with Xiaobian!

1. Does the live broadcast of NBA sports events constitute the object of copyright protection?

In recent years, whether it is Qiong Yao v. Zheng Yu or Jin Yong v. Jiangnan, the controversy behind it shows that copyright is getting more and more attention and protection. Universal copyright convention and Berne Convention both express the need to protect human intelligence and creative achievements. As a participating country of the Convention, China has also made protective provisions on copyright.

According to the relevant provisions of China’s Copyright Law, the copyright owner enjoys the copyright, and no individual or unit may infringe upon the copyright of others. Article 3 stipulates that the objects protected by China’s Copyright Law include (1) written works; (2) Oral works; (3) Works of music, drama, folk art, dance and acrobatics; (4) Works of art and architecture; (5) Photographic works; (6) cinematographic works and works created by methods similar to cinematography; (seven) engineering design drawings, product design drawings, maps, schematic drawings and other graphic works and model works; (8) Computer software, etc.

As a kind of live broadcast of sports events, the live broadcast of NBA sports events mainly focuses on shooting and broadcasting the live events of sports events. Can this kind of live broadcast of sports events constitute a film work or a work created by a method similar to filming, and then be protected by copyright?

According to the Regulations for the Implementation of the Copyright Law, the works protected by the Copyright Law refer to the intellectual achievements that are original and can be reproduced in some tangible form in the fields of literature, art and science. Therefore, to analyze whether the live broadcast of NBA matches belongs to the object of copyright protection, it mainly depends on whether the live broadcast is original and whether it can be copied in some tangible form.

1.1 How to identify originality?

International copyright treaties, such as Berne Convention and Copyright Treaty of the World Intellectual Property Organization, have not specifically recognized originality. Because of different legal systems, different countries have different understandings of originality.

1.1.1 "forehead sweat standard" and "floor standard" in common law system.

The anglo-American legal system first made it clear in the Bleistein case in 1903 that the work needed to be completed by the author independently. In later practice, Britain and the United States took "whether to work or not" as one of the factors to identify originality in order to protect the author’s labor when creating works, which is also what we call "forehead sweat standard".

In the Anglo-American legal system at this time, the court decided whether the work was original or not mainly by considering whether the work was independently completed by the author and whether the corresponding labor was invested. At this time, originality did not pay too much attention to the "creativity" of the work.

Subsequently, in the Feist phone book case in 1991, the court began to emphasize the "creativity" of the work, that is, if the author simply put in labor, he could not determine that his work was original, but also needed a certain degree of creativity. However, Britain and the United States did not clearly define the "more or less" of creativity, but adopted the "floor standard", that is, creativity can be recognized as long as there is a small amount of creativity.

We can see from it that,British and American countries identify originality mainly on the basis of "independence"-independent labor completion and "creation"-creativity.

1.1.2 High standards of civil law countries

Different from the lower standard "floor standard" adopted by Britain and the United States, the countries of civil law system are more strict in determining originality. Taking Germany as an example, it believes that originality requires the production of works to be creative labor input, and the labor input at this time is not just a simple labor input when the forehead sweats, but requires certain creativity. In other words,The originality at this time requires that the work can reflect the author’s intelligence and thoughts and feelings, and the expression of these thoughts and feelings needs to reach the level of reflecting the author’s personality..

At the same time, creativity is not as low as the "floor standard" required by Britain and the United States, but requires a high degree of creativity. This is mainly because in civil law countries, works are regarded as the children of the author, and works are the extension of the author’s personality spirit and the embodiment of the author’s thoughts and feelings. It regards copyright as a personal right, so it adopts this high standard to protect the author’s rights.

1.1.3 China’s originality standard

There is no clear legal provision on originality in legislation in China, and domestic scholars have different opinions on it. Professor Cui Guobin believes that originality requires independent creation and the creative result has the lowest degree of creativity; Professor Li Mingde believes that the author has invested in intellectual labor and has the lowest degree of creativity when creating works; Professor Wang Qian believes that originality requires that "the work product should be independently completed by the author" and "the creation of the work product should have a certain degree of creativity" …

Analysis of the views of scholars, it is not difficult to find that their recognition of originality has one thing in common."the lowest degree of creativity"This shows that our country has not adopted the high standard of originality similar to that of civil law countries, but only requires the lowest degree of creativity, which is also reflected in judicial practice.

1.2 Is the live broadcast of NBA events original?

Combined with the above introduction to the identification of originality, is it original for the live broadcast of sports events? In this regard, everyone has different views. Some people think that the focus of live broadcast of sports events lies in sports events, which are interpreted by athletes, and the filmmakers only record and broadcast according to the needs of watching the games, which should only constitute video products. However, some people think that recording sports events also reflects the intelligence and thoughts of the recorder and has certain originality.

Speaking of this, we have to mention "the first case of China’s game broadcast", that is, the five-year-long "Sina v. Fenghuang. com infringement case". After the first trial, second trial and retrial, the Beijing Higher People’s Court recently made a retrial judgment, overturning the second trial judgment, and found that the involvement of Phoenix Net and its operator Beijing Tianying Kyushu Network Technology Company infringed the copyright of Sina Internet Information Service Co., Ltd.It is believed that the live broadcast of sports events is original and constitutes a film work, which can be protected by copyright.

This case can be described as full of twists and turns. In the first instance, the court held that "the selection and arrangement of the recording shots of the competition to form a new picture for viewing is a creative labor, and the creativity will produce different picture effects due to different choices and different productions, which further reflects its creativity." That is to say, in the judgment of the first instance, the court found that the picture formed by the recording of the competition constituted the requirement of the originality of the work in China’s copyright law and belonged to the works protected by the copyright law.

However, in the second trial, the court classified this kind of film production as documentary film production, and determined it according to the original identification standard of documentary film production, so it was considered that it was not a film production, but a video production.

Subsequently, Sina did not recognize the judgment and filed a retrial with the Beijing Higher People’s Court. The Beijing Higher People’s Court held that the lowest level of creativity was adopted in the determination of originality in China. In other words, China only discussed the "existence" of creativity, not the "quantity" of creativity. The recording process of sports events reflected the choice of shooting angle, lens switching, shooting scenes and objects, selection, editing, arrangement and shooting pictures. In the final judgment of the Beijing Higher People’s Court, the court found that the live broadcast of the event involved constituted "a work created in a way similar to making a film".

From the above cases, we can see that,The live broadcast of sports events is original because it embodies the photographer’s unique ideas in the filming process.In the process of live broadcast of NBA events, Tencent Sports will not only film itself, but also explain it outside the picture, which is original in both the filming idea and the presentation of the explanation. Therefore, according to the existing judicial practice, we can conclude that the live broadcast of NBA events is original.

1.3 Does the live broadcast of the event belong to a certain medium?

We know that the live broadcast of sports events needs to be filmed on a certain medium if it wants to constitute a film work. In the case of Sina v. Fenghuang. com, the court of second instance found that Sina’s live broadcast of the Super League did not fix the filming on a certain medium, which exceeded the definition of film works in Article 4 of the Regulations for the Implementation of Copyright Law.This article stipulates that cinematographic works and works created by methods similar to cinematography refer to works that are filmed on a certain medium and consist of a series of pictures with or without sound, and are projected by means of appropriate devices or disseminated by other means.However, the regulation does not regard fixation or stable fixation as the constitutive requirements for determining whether a work is a work, so "shooting on a certain medium" should be interpreted broadly and leniently, so it is also affirmed in the judicial judgment that the live broadcast of the game belongs to shooting on a certain medium.

To sum up, if the live broadcast of sports events can reflect the individual choice and arrangement of the filmmakers, rather than just mechanical recording, it will be original, and the broad media interpretation also shows that the live broadcast of sports events meets the requirements of "shooting on a certain medium". Therefore, if Tencent Sports Live NBA matches meet the above requirements, it can also be the object of copyright protection. In fact, as early as before this judicial decision, the live broadcast of sports events was difficult to be recognized as a film work, and the filmmakers were easily infringed by their peers. In the face of such infringement, how did they do it?

Second, the infringement that may be involved in the live broadcast of sports events

2.1 may constitute unfair competition

Among many litigation disputes involved in live broadcast of sports events, the most common one is unfair competition dispute, which is mainly due to the fact that in the previous judicial practice, the products formed by live broadcast of sports events are difficult to be recognized as works protected by copyright law. Therefore, under normal circumstances, many infringers will choose to file a lawsuit on the grounds that the infringer violated the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. For example, in the case of CCTV International v. "I love chatting", the court decided that I love chatting about the company’s behavior of "broadcasting" CCTV related channels on its "tv powder" client.Although it does not constitute a broadcast act as stipulated in Article 45 of the Copyright Law, it obviously violates the market principle of fair competition, undermines the market competition mechanism, violates the principle of good faith and recognized business ethics, and constitutes unfair competition.

2.2 may constitute a violation of the right to disseminate information on the Internet.

Through the previous judicial practice, we can see that it is difficult to identify the products produced by the live broadcast of such sports events as movies or works created by similar methods. During the filming of 2014 fifa world cup TV program, Stormwind broadcasted the live broadcast of the events produced by CCTV, which is similar to the case of Sina v. Phoenix. In the second instance, the court did not identify the live broadcast of the events produced by CCTV International as movies, because according to the relevant provisions of China’s copyright law, if it cannot be identified as movies, it should be regarded as video products. Therefore, the broadcast behavior of Stormwind Technology also constitutes an infringement on the information network communication right of CCTV International.

Of course, in the latest retrial judgment of "CCTV International v. Stormwind Technology" on October 9, 2020, we found that, like Sina v. Phoenix.com, the Beijing Higher People’s Court once again determined that CCTV International’s live sports events constitute film works, which also gave new guidance to courts at all levels in the future in judging similar cases, that is, live sports events can be recognized as film works if they meet the relevant recognition conditions. This is a breakthrough, and this kind of judgment also shows that the criteria for determining the originality of a work do not reflect the level, but only the presence or absence. Such progress is conducive to solving the problem of protection of sports programs. We know that the most important thing about this kind of sports events is timeliness, and viewers rarely watch them again after watching them. Therefore, if only the live sports events constitute video products, it will be difficult to stop unauthorized TV broadcasting and Internet broadcasting due to the "safe haven principle" involved in the right of network information dissemination, which is likely to bring irreparable losses to the producers of the programs. At the same time, it is considered that it is difficult to solve the demand of subsequent program trading and protection only by the Anti-Unfair Competition Law.

Third, is it worthwhile for Tencent to spend 500 million yuan to buy the exclusive broadcasting rights?

From the above analysis, we can see that the live broadcast of sports events can already constitute a film work in copyright. After Tencent bought the sole broadcast right, if other video broadcast platforms broadcast the live broadcast of the events recorded by Tencent, it will constitute an infringement of Tencent Sports, and Tencent Sports can file an infringement lawsuit for compensation.

At the same time, Tencent Sports can monopolize the domestic live broadcast of this event by virtue of its exclusive broadcasting rights, and Tencent Sports charges a high membership fee and its various reward functions will bring more profits to Tencent. Tencent’s signing the NBA this time and buying its exclusive broadcasting rights for the next five years can be said to be very cost-effective. Despite the influence of the suspension of NBA broadcast by CCTV last year, Tencent can still make huge profits as the only live broadcast platform in China.

In fact, there is still a "hidden knowledge point" here. Why did Tencent buy the sole broadcasting right and CCTV still broadcast it? This is mainly because the NBA gives some NBA games broadcasting rights or highlights to CCTV Sports Channel free of charge every year, and Tencent Sports buys online live broadcast rights, while CCTV is a live TV broadcast, which has no conflict of interest with Tencent Sports’ exclusive broadcast rights. Therefore, although Tencent bought exclusive broadcast rights, it is only online live broadcast rights, and CCTV can still broadcast them for free on sports channels.

After knowing this "hidden knowledge point", will you choose Tencent or CCTV in the future?

All the people know how to entertain and know more about the law.

Focus on cultural and entertainment legal services!

(This article was originally created by the Lele Entertainment Law and cannot be reproduced without permission. The picture comes from the internet. If there is any infringement, please contact to delete it. )

　　Xinhua News Agency, Hong Kong, December 5 (Reporter Meng Jia) According to the Civil Aviation Department of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government, the C919 and ARJ21 aircraft independently developed by the state will visit Hong Kong for the first time on the 12th and stay there until the 17th. This will be the first time that a C919 plane has visited a city outside the mainland.

　　ARJ21 is the first turbofan regional aircraft designed and manufactured independently by China. It was put into commercial operation in 2016 and officially delivered to overseas customers in 2022, and entered the international market. C919 is a large passenger plane designed, manufactured and certified for airworthiness in strict accordance with internationally accepted airworthiness standards. The first commercial C919 was delivered to airlines in December 2022 and put into service in 2023. The successful development of these two passenger airliners is an important milestone in the national aviation manufacturing industry.

　　The event was jointly organized by the Civil Aviation Department of the Hong Kong SAR Government and the Hong Kong Airport Authority. Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China was invited to send C919 and ARJ21 aircraft to visit Hong Kong.

　　Li Jiachao, Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, welcomed the first visit of C919 and ARJ21 aircraft to Hong Kong. He said that this fully reflects the country’s emphasis on the development of Hong Kong’s aviation industry and Hong Kong’s role as an international aviation hub. The 14th Five-Year Plan and the Outline of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Development Plan clearly support the consolidation of Hong Kong’s position as an international aviation hub.

　　One of these two types of aircraft will arrive at the Hong Kong International Airport on the 12th, and will be statically displayed in a fixed area of the Hong Kong International Airport, and representatives of the aviation industry, youth groups and regional organizations will be arranged to board the plane for a visit.

　　Another highlight of this activity is the flight demonstration on the 16th. If weather conditions permit, the C919 will take off from Hong Kong International Airport, fly over Victoria Harbour and fly around Hong Kong Island twice. At that time, the public can have a glimpse of the domestic large aircraft.

　　On the afternoon of 16th, representatives of Comac China will be invited to meet with teenagers at the headquarters of the Civil Aviation Department to share their knowledge about the two aircraft. Two planes will leave Hong Kong and return to Shanghai on the afternoon of 17th.

　　Liao Zhiyong, Director of the Civil Aviation Department of the Hong Kong SAR Government, said that since 2012, the National Civil Aviation Administration has invited the Civil Aviation Department to participate in the preliminary work of the research and development of the C919 aircraft, and the Civil Aviation Department has been actively participating. Liao Zhiyong was very excited and looking forward to the opportunity to witness the flight of C919 over Hong Kong, and thanked the Civil Aviation Administration of China and Comac China for their full support and cooperation.

　　Zhongxin Jingwei Client May 23rd (Zhang Yunan) CPI data of 31 provinces in April 2019 have been released one after another, and hot topics such as "Garlic You Bite", "Cherry Freedom" and "Toona sinensis Freedom" have recently returned to the public’s field of vision. Under the strong siege of vegetable prices and fruit prices, what are the CPI performances of the provinces?

　　CPI in 16 provinces rose more than the whole country.

　　In April 2019, the national consumer price rose by 2.5% year-on-year, continuing to be in the "2 era". In food, the price of fresh vegetables is still at a high level, rising by 17.4% year-on-year, affecting the CPI increase by about 0.43%; Pork prices rose by 14.4%, an increase of 9.3% over the previous month, which affected the CPI increase by about 0.31%. Last autumn, the fruit harvest in the north was poor, and this year’s stock was insufficient. The price of fresh fruit rose by 11.9%, which affected the CPI increase by about 0.22%.

　　From the perspective of 31 provinces in China, according to the incomplete statistics of Sino-Singapore Jingwei client, the CPI of 16 provinces rose more than the whole country in April, with the highest increase in Tianjin, Hebei and Anhui, reaching 2.9%; Hunan and the national CPI rose flat, up 2.5% year-on-year; The increase in Beijing and Xinjiang was small, at 1.6%.

　　Don’t look at the classification, there are 13 provinces with a year-on-year increase in fresh fruits over the whole country, and Anhui has an increase of 30.9%, the largest increase; Only the fresh fruit in Ningxia rose by more than 20%, which was 20.4%; There are 18 provinces with an increase of over 10%, with a large number; Qinghai rose by 1.9%, with a small range.

　　In addition, there are 10 provinces where the year-on-year increase of fresh vegetables exceeds the national level; Chongqing and the national fresh vegetables rose at the same level, at 17.4%; There are three provinces with an increase of less than 10%.

　　On pork, from the provinces that have announced the increase, Anhui has the largest increase, reaching 24.7%; Followed by Sichuan, up 23.4%; The lowest is Guizhou, up 7.6%.

　　Is it really so difficult to achieve "fruit freedom"?

　　Following "Toona sinensis Freedom", "Garlic You Are Malicious" and "Cherry Freedom", "Fruit Freedom" has also been screened on the Internet recently, which has aroused heated discussions. In fact, after the Spring Festival, the news about the price increase of fruits is endless. It is even reported that the fruit price in Beijing Xinfadi wholesale market has generally increased by 78% compared with the same period of last year.

　　The Zhongxin Jingwei client combed the website data of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs and found that the price of Fuji apple has been rising for 9 weeks in a row among the five fruits it focuses on monitoring. As of mid-May, the price of Fuji apple was 10.33 yuan/kg, up 60.7% year-on-year. In addition, the price of watermelon has been on the rise year-on-year. As of mid-May, the price of watermelon was 4.86 yuan/kg, up 29.7% year-on-year.

　　It is worth noting that the retail price of fruit is also "rising". According to the data of Hunan Provincial Department of Commerce, from May 15th to 21st, the number of seasonal fruits on the market decreased, the purchase price of producing areas increased, and the average retail price of fruits increased. The retail prices of six kinds of fruits monitored mainly increased by 3 and decreased by 3, and the overall average retail price increased by 0.28% from the previous month. Among them, the prices of grapes, apples and pears rose by 1.01%, 0.52% and 0.2% respectively.

　　According to the data of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Commerce, from May 6 to 12, the purchase and sale of the market dropped in the week after May 1, and the overall price rose slightly, with the price of fruits and eggs rising at the top. The wholesale market price of fruit rose by 1.7%, and the supermarket price rose by 3.7%. At present, there are many kinds of fruits in the market. The average price of cherries, loquats, cantaloupes and watermelons in other producing areas has increased due to the stacking of transportation costs in other places, low early adopters and high prices.

　　Is "fruit freedom" really hard to achieve? In response, Liu Aihua, spokesperson of the National Bureau of Statistics, responded on May 15th that the prices of fresh vegetables and fresh fruits are obviously affected by seasonal factors of extreme weather, and these seasonal short-term shocks are not sustainable, so the price increase of fresh vegetables and fresh fruits will not last at a high level.

　　Haitong futures also analyzed that the recent increase in fruit prices was attributed to the severe weather in the north and south fruit producing areas in 2018-2019. Therefore, in the gap period of the current fruit market, the summer melon fruits with large output have not been listed yet, the fruit stocks in the north have basically bottomed out last year, and the tropical fruits in the south are expected to reduce production. Under the influence of multiple factors, the fruit market price has been rising.

　　As for the worry that the "cherry freedom" of the screen is difficult to achieve and the ordinary "fruit freedom" is lost, some institutions think it is unnecessary anxiety. The price of fruit is determined by market supply and demand, and the price increase is a short-term phenomenon. With the adjustment of the market, the tide of fruit price increase may end.

　　Haitong futures said that in the short term, after June, summer fruits will be listed in large quantities. Although the production of litchi, longan and mango in the southern tropical fruit producing areas is expected to decrease, the output of mainstream fruits such as watermelon, cantaloupe and peach is expected to maintain the normal level in previous years, while the output of bananas and oranges is expected to increase slightly. Therefore, the overall supply of summer fruits is sufficient, and "fruit freedom" can still be expected.

　　CITIC Jiantou also analyzed that from the historical market, after experiencing a short-term price increase in the second quarter, fruit will gradually fall back and remain in a relatively stable range. This is mainly due to the production pressure caused by the interference of weather factors. After the price increase in the second quarter, it will be released, and the listing of new fruits in the later period will further stabilize the price. Therefore, fruit prices do not have the conditions for a sharp rise, but there will be a wave of rising prices in the short term.

　　Regarding the trend of CPI in the second quarter, Liu Aihua pointed out that there will be no sharp increase in CPI in the future, regardless of food, industrial consumer goods and services, and there is a solid foundation for stable prices. Everbright Securities believes that the year-on-year increase of CPI is expected to reach a high of 2.6% to 2.7% in the second quarter and this year, respectively, and the annual center may be 2.3%, the highest level in the past five years. (Zhongxin Jingwei APP)

　　Every time I get the AI news, some investors ask questions on the investor interaction platform: On February 21st, I said on the investor interaction platform that the Qingdao Donghua Sub-center Industrial Park has been completed at present. Please pay attention to the company’s official website, WeChat WeChat official account and other platforms in time for the specific production time. Excuse me, what new projects do the Qingdao Donghua Sub-center built by the company in three years give investors a return?

　　(002065. SZ) On February 26th, it was indicated on the investor interaction platform that the National Sub-center will be the second headquarters of the company, and the Donghua Yundu Intelligent Computing Center will be built to promote the coordinated development of the industrial chain by attracting its own subsidiaries, shareholding enterprises and upstream and downstream enterprises.

In the first month, "Lantern Festival" came, and the excitement of Zhoucun Ancient Mall lies in "thousands of lights are shining, seven flowers are blooming", in "a song is like the sea, and thousands of lights are like the night", and more importantly, in "300 wives dancing in sleeves, singing words in the sky for a moment" … enjoy the flower lights, listen to ditty, play and taste delicious food. At this moment, Zhoucun Ancient Mall

"Happy E-Class" takes the form of live broadcast and video recording, providing parents with an online family education lecture hall, reducing parents’ worries about being busy with work and having no time to study, and providing online guidance by experts to help families set up air classes, create a good learning atmosphere and enhance the happiness of family education.

What if the child talks back and loses his temper?

Listen to He Laoshi!

Children’s behavior problems may not be serious, but if they are not handled properly, they will have a great impact on children’s physical and mental health and learning and growth.

Children always talk back and lose their temper easily. What should parents do?

In fact, when children talk back, most of them have emotions in their hearts, and even many emotions are intertwined, such as dissatisfaction, anger, injustice, irritability and so on. When talking back can’t solve the problem, or lead to greater pressure and blow, losing your temper is a manifestation of your child’s helplessness and inability to cope. Why do children have such emotions? In fact, nine times out of ten, parents provoked it.

Parents are mostly unconscious.

I didn’t realize it myself

Let’s look in the mirror first.

The first mirror: no letter mirror

Many children will vomit: "I promised to accompany me, but I always left me alone because of this and that." "I clearly agreed to let me go out to play, and I changed my mind just because I was not obedient and made him unhappy." "I originally agreed to buy me a gift, because I didn’t do well in the exam, it was ruined."

Mom and dad will also be very wronged: "We are not all for your own good, but also have to work and take care of the family. No matter how busy we are, we all want to squeeze some time for you. I really can’t help it."

"I promised you to go out to play and buy gifts not only to make you happy, but also to encourage you to work hard and make progress. I hope you can become a talent. You can’t do it. I can only warn you by not letting you go out to play and not buying gifts. I hope you can take a warning and encourage you to do better next time."

In fact, for children, what can motivate them to work hard is not gifts or play, but how important he is in your heart. What matters is your work friend, whether he listens or not, his grades or him. These are all things. We ignore people’s feelings for things. Children feel bad, and they can’t do things well.

What children need is the feeling of being valued. If they promise not to do so, they will arouse their emotions.

The second mirror: double standard mirror

Parents’ two sets of standards are spit out by children:

1. Parents watch mobile phones for work or relaxation, while children watch mobile phones for fun;

2. It is hard for parents to sleep at 12 o’clock, and children will not arrange time to sleep at 12 o’clock;

3. Parents are good for their children when they lose their temper, and children are not sensible when they lose their temper;

4. Take the advantages of other people’s children to benchmark the shortcomings of their own children;

5. When my brother loses his temper, my mother will coax him, and when I lose my temper, my mother will get angry.

The third mirror: haha mirror

Unrealistic expressions, such as: parents don’t understand the situation and children are misunderstood; Parents will criticize in a general and generalized way. If they are late twice, they will say: You are always late and don’t care about your study at all; Parents like to turn over old scores. What happened a few years ago has long been changed, and it will be brought out to talk about things.

The fourth mirror: the authoritative mirror

Parents are used to nagging, reasoning, and using authoritative methods. They don’t convince their children, or they don’t understand the reasons why their children don’t do or can’t do it. They just ask their children to obey blindly. If they are not convinced, they will want to express their ideas and talk back with emotion.

There are two extremes in blindly forcing children to change. One extreme is that there is a child in your family who is stubborn and doesn’t bow his head easily. A strong approach will arouse his greater emotions to confront you, and will also inspire his fighting spirit to think of more ways to fight with you. In the end, your attention is focused on defeating each other, ignoring the really important learning and growth. At the other extreme, parents have successfully suppressed their children, and your children have gradually become good children who dare not express, dare not say no, and have no ideas of their own, or have formed a mode of suppressing emotions and forbearing to please.

In either case, the problems may be magnified or even erupted when you are in adolescence or when you are faced with the high pressure of the college entrance examination. If you solve them at that time, the price you have to pay will be great, and even some effects will be irreversible.

Therefore, to solve the problem of children talking back and losing their temper from the root, both parents and children need to work together and change at the same time.

So how to change it?

Two magic weapons for you

Magic Weapon 1: Harmonious Trilogy (Parents)

Step 1: When the child talks back and loses his temper, mom and dad should keep calm.

If you can’t, you can meditate in your mind:

When a child loses his temper, he is actually only three years old. I am * * * years old. I am not as knowledgeable as a three-year-old child, and I don’t want to be three years old. I’ll talk to him when he calms down.

Step 2: Look at yourself with four mirrors. What provoked the child just now?

If we find ourselves falling into the situation of the first three mirrors, and our children are wronged, we need to sincerely apologize. If it’s the situation reflected in the fourth mirror [authoritative mirror], it’s obvious that the way of authoritative coercion doesn’t work for your child. We need to change the way and can’t confront the child head-on.

Step 3: Listen carefully to your child’s thoughts, express your expectations, find what you want together, and discuss with your child how to reach an agreement.

When the child is calm after the problem is solved. We need to have an after-the-fact talk with our children and express how you hope that in the future, when children are emotional and dissatisfied with you, they can talk in addition to talking back and losing their temper. If you do something inappropriate, ask your child to look in the mirror and express his thoughts and feelings directly, instead of talking back.

Magic weapon 2: can use four-step expression (children)

1. You just said …;

2. I feel very … (emotional);

3. Because … (Tell the truth reflected by the faithless mirror, the double-standard mirror, the haha mirror and the authoritative mirror);

I want to … (say what I think).

Of course, the next time a child uses the four-step expression, parents should not become angry from embarrassment. They need to take the initiative to enter the Harmony Trilogy, adjust their state, look at themselves in the mirror, and discuss with their children how to solve the current problems. Don’t forget to praise the children in this process! Because of his active expression, you can avoid misunderstanding and quarrel, and help you grow up by reminding you.

Mom and dad,

When children talk back,

Let’s not lose our temper,

Try to look in the four mirrors and find the problem.

Guide children to use four-step expressions.

When you find a problem, you have a chance to solve it.

Change takes time to accumulate,

Let’s take our time together.

He yanhong

Yiwu maisuihua family education guidance center tutor

Jane, quick and happy relationship tutor

National registered second-level psychological counselor

Adolescent mental growth tutor

Source | Yiwu Women

Original title: "Happy E Home Classroom | What should I do if my child talks back and loses his temper? 》

Read the original text